Agricultural field viewed from above

Satellite · Public example

Tepoztlán: a healthy result with a trend worth monitoring

The one-hectare field scores 71.3/100 with full data coverage. The verdict is healthy, but the vegetation-index trend calls for a more careful reading. Score, time series and map each answer a different part of the question.

This is a real public example, not a generic client mission or a guarantee of results. Another site will not necessarily produce the same figures.

Key figures

  • Score: 71.3/100 · healthy.
  • Usable series: 11 of 12 months.
  • Recent NDVI: 0.48.
  • NDVI trend: −0.04/month.
  • Recent NDRE: 0.29.

1. Keep weak signals visible in the aggregate

The result combines vigor, trend, stress/heterogeneity, climate, context and external risk. This composition prevents a good climate or context value from hiding a less favorable vegetation dynamic. The score prioritizes interpretation; it does not identify a cause.

Climate and context reach 90/100 and external risk 100/100, while vigor at 60/100 and trend at 55/100 explain why healthy does not mean no monitoring.

Climate, context and external risk lift the aggregate, while vigor 60/100 and trend 55/100 explain why healthy does not mean no monitoring.Extract from the public Spanish-language report.

2. Separate current state from direction

NDVI describes observed photosynthetic vigor, while NDRE uses the red-edge band and can add sensitivity to chlorophyll change. Neither diagnoses disease, nitrogen deficiency or water stress on its own. A downward trend opens an investigation, not an automatic prescription.

The shaded band is the within-field p10–p90 spread, not a statistical confidence interval.

Eleven months are usable and one is masked by cloud. Recent NDVI averages 0.48 with an estimated −0.04 monthly trend; recent NDRE is 0.29.Extract from the public Spanish-language report.

3. Use the map to decide where to inspect

Sentinel-2 composites are about 10 m per pixel. On a one-hectare parcel, each pixel represents a substantial share, and boundaries, mixed cover and polygon accuracy can influence the result. The map guides a visit or sampling; it does not replace agronomic observation.

The recent scene has mean NDVI 0.47 versus 0.85 for the comparable prior-year scene, both with 100% valid pixels. Colors locate differences but do not explain them.Extract from the public Spanish-language report.

What to check in the field

  • Compare lower-index areas with moisture, irrigation, compaction, shade and actual cover.
  • Review pest or disease symptoms and take leaf or soil tests when justified.
  • Confirm crop, variety and growth stage present during each scene.
  • Repeat the observation with the same polygon and record interventions to interpret change.

Context and limits of the case

The profile is generic, with deliberately broad ranges. Leptosol soil, 14.6% average slope, rainfall variability and protected-area context add context but do not prove the cause of the decline. Mean p90–p10 spread of 0.14 suggests relatively limited spatial heterogeneity without excluding small hotspots or temporal change.

The report helps decide where and when to investigate. It does not prescribe fertilizer, pesticide or irrigation without crop information and professional validation.

Related drone operations

Sources

Public PDFs sample-r2-agro-mx.{es,en,fr}.pdf, 24 pages, edition of 2026-07-16. ES figures from pages 2, 3 and 8; the page-8 figure was cropped without altering the two maps. An NDVI/NDRE change is never turned into a cause diagnosis or prescription; the crop profile is generic and thresholds are indicative.